Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Modern goal-oriented requirements engineering frameworks use modeling as a means of better understanding a domain, leading to an overall improvement in the quality of the requirements. Regulations and laws impose additional context and constraints oil software goals and can limit the satisfaction of stakeholder needs. Organizations and software developers need modeling tools that can properly address the potential deep impact legal issues call have oil the effectiveness of business strategies. In this paper, we perform a preliminary study into the development of a modeling framework able to support the analysis of legal prescriptions alongside business strategies. We demonstrate, via all example drawn from a case Study of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), how models of this law can be built with the GRL modeling language and how they call be evaluated as part of the business goal models. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1007/978-3-642-01187-0_23 | Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Business Modeling,Goal-oriented Requirement Language,HIPAA,Law Modeling | Artifact-centric business process model,Process modeling,Requirements engineering,Modeling language,Business requirements,Business model,Goal modeling,Business process modeling,Engineering,Law | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
26 | 1865-1348 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.39 | 13 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sepideh Ghanavati | 1 | 416 | 26.40 |
| Alberto Siena | 2 | 297 | 27.63 |
| Anna Perini | 3 | 1165 | 83.51 |
| Daniel Amyot | 4 | 1709 | 140.89 |
| Liam Peyton | 5 | 477 | 44.61 |
| Angelo Susi | 6 | 1057 | 83.69 |