Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In a balancing network each processor has an initial collection of unit-size jobs (tokens) and in each round, pairs of processors connected by balancers split their load as evenly as possible. An excess token (if any) is placed according to some predefined rule. As it turns out, this rule crucially affects the performance of the network. In this work we propose a model that studies this effect. We suggest a model bridging the uniformly-random assignment rule, and the arbitrary one (in the spirit of smoothed-analysis). We start with an arbitrary assignment of balancer directions and then flip each assignment with probability α independently. For a large class of balancing networks our result implies that after \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathrsfs}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ \end{document} rounds the discrepancy is \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathrsfs}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathcal{O}( (1/2-\alpha) \log n + \log \log n)$ \end{document} with high probability. This matches and generalizes known upper bounds for α = 0 and α = 1/2. We also show that a natural network matches the upper bound for any α. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 39, 115–138, 2011 (A conference version of this article appeared in the 36th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2009).) |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1002/rsa.20341 | international colloquium on automata, languages and programming |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
smoothed analysis,arbitrary assignment,rule crucially,high probability,predefined rule,natural network,uniformly-random assignment rule,balancing network,inc. random struct,log n,upper bound,load balance,random assignment,col | Journal | 39 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 1042-9832 | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.46 | 21 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tobias Friedrich | 1 | 457 | 23.56 |
Thomas Sauerwald | 2 | 575 | 39.99 |
Dan Vilenchik | 3 | 143 | 13.36 |