Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The LCF system was the first mechanical theorem prover to be user-programmable via a metalanguage, ML, from which the functional programming language Standard ML has been developed. Paulson has demonstrated how a modular rewriting engine can be implemented in LCF. This provides both clarity and flexibility. This paper shows that the same modular approach (using higher-order functions) allows transparent optimisation of the rewriting engine; performance can be improved while few, if any, changes are required to code written using these functions. The techniques described have been implemented in the HOL system, a descendant of LCF, and some are now in daily use. Comparative results are given. Some of the techniques described, in particular ones to avoid processing parts of a data structure that do not need to be changed, may be of more general use in functional programming and beyond. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1999 | 10.1017/S0956796899003391 | J. Funct. Program. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
comparative result,hol system,daily use,functional programming,general use,transparent optimisation,standard ml,data structure,modular approach,functional programming language,lcf system | HOL,Data structure,Programming language,Standard ML,Functional programming,Combinatory logic,Computer science,Theoretical computer science,Rewriting,Metalanguage,Modular design | Journal |
Volume | Issue | Citations |
9 | 2 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.38 | 13 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Richard J. Boulton | 1 | 255 | 23.64 |