Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Solving Sudoku puzzles is one of the most popular pastimes in the world. Puzzles range in difficulty from easy to very challenging; the hardest puzzles tend to have the most empty cells. The current paper explains and compares three algorithms for solving Sudoku puzzles. Backtracking, simulated annealing, and alternating projections are generic methods for attacking combinatorial optimization problems. Our results favor backtracking. It infallibly solves a Sudoku puzzle or deduces that a unique solution does not exist. However, backtracking does not scale well in high-dimensional combinatorial optimization. Hence, it is useful to expose students in the mathematical sciences to the other two solution techniques in a concrete setting. Simulated annealing shares a common structure with MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) and enjoys wide applicability. The method of alternating projections solves the feasibility problem in convex programming. Converting a discrete optimization problem into a continuous optimization problem opens up the possibility of handling combinatorial problems of much higher dimensionality. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2012 | CoRR | Simulated annealing,Mathematical optimization,Markov chain Monte Carlo,Combinatorial optimization,Curse of dimensionality,Backtracking,Discrete optimization problem,Mathematical sciences,Convex optimization,Mathematics |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1203.2295 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 2 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric C. Chi | 1 | 93 | 6.89 |
| Kenneth Lange | 2 | 3 | 2.80 |