Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Sophisticated on-line tools play an important role in the software life-cycle, by decreasing software development and maintenance effort without sacrificing software quality. Using multiple tools simultaneously would be very beneficial; however, with most contemporary tools, this is impossible since they are often based on incompatible methods of data acquisition and control. This is due largely to their relative independence, and could be overcome by an appropriately designed common on-line monitoring system. We consider three possible platforms that might be potentially capable of addressing this issue, and discuss the relative merits and demerits of each. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1007/3-540-45492-6_26 | HPCN Europe |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
on-line monitoring,important role,contemporary tool,common on-line monitoring system,data acquisition,software development,relative independence,relative merit,interoperability support,sophisticated on-line tool,software life-cycle,software quality,software life cycle | Computer science,Interoperability,Data acquisition,Common Object Request Broker Architecture,Risk analysis (engineering),Service module,Software,Software architecture,Software quality,Software development,Operating system,Distributed computing | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
1823 | 0302-9743 | 3-540-67553-1 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.51 | 6 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jörg Trinitis | 1 | 19 | 2.95 |
| Vaidy S. Sunderam | 2 | 998 | 162.45 |
| Thomas Ludwig, II | 3 | 45 | 12.12 |
| Roland Wismüller | 4 | 436 | 66.49 |