Title | ||
---|---|---|
Evaluating an online pharmaceutical education system for pharmacy interns in critical care settings. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Incorporating electronic learning (eLearning) system into professional experimental programs such as pharmacy internships is a challenge. However, none of the current systems can fully support the unique needs of clinical pharmacy internship. In this study we enhanced a commercial eLearning system for clinical pharmacy internship (The Clinical Pharmacy Internship eLearning System, CPIES). The KAP questionnaire was used to evaluate the performance of group A with the traditional teaching model and group B with the CPIES teaching model. The CPIES teaching model showed significant improvement in interns' knowledge and practice (p = 0.002 and 0.031, respectively). The traditional teaching model only demonstrated significant improvement in practice (p = 0.011). Moreover, professionalism, such as attitudes on cooperating with other health professionals, is developed by learning from a good mentor. The on-line teaching and traditional teaching methods should undoubtedly be blended in a complete teaching model in order to improve learners' professional knowledge, facilitate correct attitude, and influence good practice. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.006 | Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
significant improvement,traditional teaching model,clinical pharmacy internship,critical care setting,cpies teaching model,elearning,online pharmaceutical education system,complete teaching model,clinical pharmacy,on-line teaching,internet learning,kap,good practice,clinical pharmacy internship elearning,traditional teaching method,commercial elearning system,system evaluation | Journal | 113 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
2 | 1872-7565 | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.44 | 10 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yu-Ting Yeh | 1 | 31 | 6.42 |
Hsiang-Yin Chen | 2 | 6 | 2.73 |
Kuei-Ju Cheng | 3 | 2 | 0.44 |
Ssu-An Hou | 4 | 2 | 0.44 |
Yu-Hsuan Yen | 5 | 2 | 0.78 |
Chien-Tsai Liu | 6 | 202 | 31.64 |