Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The ISO 26262 -Functional Safety for Road Vehicles- describes a safety life-cycle, that has to be considered concurrently to the life-cycle of the vehicle development. Also the design of the electric/electronic architecture does not specify the implementation of electronic and software based vehicle functions, it forms the basis for their realization and distribution to the vehicle's networked hardware artifacts. In this paper we present the formal and tool-based approach for the propagation of ISO 26262 safety goals to artifacts of an initial electric/electronic architecture. With a set of metrics, we evaluate the architecture before and after its safety refinement, respective to the high level failure modes omission and commission. The process of annotation, evaluation and refinement is exemplary shown at the electric/electronic architecture for a retractable rear spoiler. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1145/2000259.2000278 | QoSA/ISARCS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
electronic architecture,safety goal,safety refinement,high level failure mode,safety life-cycle,networked hardware artifact,metric-based safety workflow,vehicle function,vehicle development,road vehicles,functional safety,life cycle,failure mode,iso 26262 | Failure mode and effects analysis,Spoiler,Architecture,Systems engineering,Functional safety,Software,Engineering,Reference architecture,Software architecture,Workflow,Embedded system | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.39 | 2 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Hillenbrand | 1 | 21 | 4.71 |
| Matthias Heinz | 2 | 20 | 5.30 |
| Klaus D. Müller-Glaser | 3 | 148 | 32.64 |
| Nico Adler | 4 | 22 | 4.19 |