Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The notion of quality in requirements specifications is poorly understood, and in most literature only bread and butter lists of useful properties have been provided. However, the recent frameworks of Lindland et al. and Pohl have tried to take a more systematic approach. In this paper, these two frameworks are reviewed and compared. Although they have different outlook, their deeper structures are not contradictory. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1007/3-540-59498-1_239 | Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering |
Keywords | DocType | ISBN |
requirements engineering,social construction,deeper understanding,qual- ity,conceptual modelling,requirement engineering | Conference | 3-540-59498-1 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
49 | 6.18 | 17 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
John Krogstie | 1 | 1234 | 129.93 |
odd ivar lindland | 2 | 604 | 48.61 |
Guttorm Sindre | 3 | 1690 | 130.04 |