Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Argumentation theory studies the fundamental mechanism humans use in argumentation and explores ways to implement this mechanism on computers. Dung's approach, presented in [9], is a unifying framework which has played an influential role on argumentation research. In this paper, we show that, a logic programming semantics, called MMr, can be used to characterize the preferred argumentation semantics defined by Dung in [9]. The MMr [12] is based on the the minimal model semantics. The characterization of this argumentation semantics by the MMr semantics suggests a new perception of this argumentation semantics in terms of logic foundations. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1007/978-3-642-25324-9_2 | MICAI'11 Proceedings of the 10th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume Part I |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
influential role,minimal model semantics,argumentation semantics,preferred argumentation semantics,argumentation research,logic programming semantics,fundamental mechanism human,logic foundation,MMr semantics,argumentation theory study | Proof-theoretic semantics,Formal semantics (linguistics),Operational semantics,Computer science,Denotational semantics,Action semantics,Theoretical computer science,Probabilistic argumentation,Game semantics,Well-founded semantics | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
7094 | 0302-9743 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 14 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Mauricio Osorio | 1 | 436 | 52.82 |
José Luis Carballido | 2 | 53 | 12.62 |
Claudia Zepeda | 3 | 93 | 21.57 |
Zenaida Cruz | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |