Title | ||
---|---|---|
Energy Efficient Radio Access Architectures for Green Radio: Large versus Small Cell Size Deployment |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper new architectural approaches that improve the energy efficiency of a cellular radio access network (RAN) are investigated. The aim of the paper is to characterize both the energy consumption ratio (ECR) and the energy consumption gain (ECG) of a cellular RAN when the cell size is reduced for a given user density and service area. The paper affirms that reducing the cell size reduces the cell ECR as desired while increasing the capacity density but the overall RAN energy consumption remains unchanged. In order to trade the increase in capacity density with RAN energy consumption, without degrading the cell capacity provision, a sleep mode is introduced. In sleep mode, cells without active users are powered-off, thereby saving energy. By combining a sleep mode with a small-cell deployment architecture, the paper shows that the ECG can be increased by the factor n = (Rlarge/Rsmall)2 while the cell ECR continues to decrease with decreasing cell size. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/VETECF.2009.5379035 | VTC Fall |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
service area,cell size,capacity density,green radio,cellular radio,user density,radio access networks,energy consumption ratio,telecommunication network management,cellular radio access network,sleep mode,energy consumption gain,base stations,computer architecture,radio access network,antennas,energy efficient | Base station,Software deployment,Computer science,Efficient energy use,Computer network,Green radio,Electronic engineering,Sleep mode,Ran,Energy consumption,Access network | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1090-3038 E-ISBN : 978-1-4244-2515-0 | 978-1-4244-2515-0 | 96 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
7.51 | 2 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Biljana Badic | 1 | 155 | 15.90 |
Tim O'Farrell | 2 | 312 | 31.99 |
Pavel Loskot | 3 | 195 | 25.34 |
Jianhua He | 4 | 599 | 53.56 |