Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper documents a study of change in commercial, proprietary software and attempts to determine whether a relationship exists between a class’ propensity to change and its design context; more specifically: whether a class is a participant in a design pattern.We identify specific design patterns and their propensity for change. Design pattern participants were found to have a higher propensity to change than classes that did not participate in a design pattern, supporting an earlier study by Bieman et al.; some design patterns, such as the Adaptor, Factory Method and Singleton were found have a higher change propensity than others. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/WCRE.2009.31 | WCRE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
design patterns,higher change propensity,design context,design pattern,design pattern participant,specific design pattern,proprietary c,factory method,higher propensity,paper document,change proneness,proprietary software,earlier study,replication,singleton,pattern,data mining,change,c,software engineering,object recognition | Systems engineering,Computer science,Software design pattern,Software,Singleton,Factory method pattern,Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition,Design pattern | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
1095-1350 | 12 | 0.57 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Matt Gatrell | 1 | 14 | 1.63 |
Steve Counsell | 2 | 1732 | 117.90 |
Tracy Hall | 3 | 443 | 12.96 |