Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Trust seals, such as the VeriSign and TRUSTe logos, are widely used to indicate a website is reputable. But how much protection do they offer to online shoppers? We conducted a study in which 60 experienced online shoppers rated 6 websites --- with and without trust seals - based on how trustworthy they perceived them to be. Eye tracking data reveals that 38% of participants failed to notice any of the trust seals present. When seals were noticed, the ratings assigned to each website were significantly higher than for the same website without a seal, but qualitative analysis of the interview data revealed significant misconceptions of their meaning (e.g. "presence of seals automatically legitimizes any website"). Participants tended to rely on self-developed --- but inaccurate --- heuristics for assessing trustworthiness (e.g. perceived investment in website development, or references to other recognizable entities). We conclude that trust seals currently do not offer effective protection against scam websites; and suggest that other mechanisms --- such as automatic verification of authenticity are required to support consumers' trust decisions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1007/978-3-642-30921-2_18 | TRUST |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
user perception,recognizable entity,automatic verification,interview data,trust seal,truste logo,experienced online shopper,trust decision,effective protection,website development,qualitative analysis | Web development,Internet privacy,Computer security,Trustworthiness,Computer science,Logos Bible Software,Eye tracking,Heuristics,Notice,Perception,E-commerce | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
7 | 0.53 | 20 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Iacovos Kirlappos | 1 | 51 | 3.64 |
Martina Angela Sasse | 2 | 2389 | 243.30 |
Nigel Harvey | 3 | 8 | 2.60 |