Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We reply to McQueen’s commentary by comparing the parsimony of his account of relevant data and the computational model he favors with the explanation and model we favor. His account requires multiple independent explanations and mechanisms. Ours requires one: lexical feedback. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2003 | 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00067-3 | Cognitive Science |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Lexical effects,Parsimony,Computational model,Language understanding | Cognitive science,Psychology,Cognitive psychology,Coarticulation,Language understanding | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
27 | 5 | 0364-0213 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.44 | 1 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| James S. Magnuson | 1 | 15 | 10.54 |
| Bob McMurray | 2 | 45 | 10.07 |
| Michael K. Tanenhaus | 3 | 109 | 33.78 |
| Richard N. Aslin | 4 | 83 | 17.77 |