Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
One trend dealing with the growing computational power needs is to implement multi-processor system-on-a-chip (MPSoC) using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) partially reconfigurable architectures. However the low Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) cost solution provided by commercial FPGAs must take into account the high sensitivity to electronic defects. Fault-tolerance schemes, which prevent their architectures from being defective during products life-time, can decrease the system computing power. Therefore, building such fault-tolerant system needs an analytical model to analyze the effect of fault mitigation schemes on the system performance. This paper presents an analytical approach for a fault-tolerant dynamic multi-processor system-on-a-chip (FT-DyMPSoC) which is able to resist to predominant fault in FPGAs - Single Event Upset. The analytical model is introduced to assess the performance, the reliability and the trade-off of a fault-tolerant MPSoC system. Several comparisons with classical fault-tolerance solutions to enhance our solution advantages are also given. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/FPL.2010.38 | FPL |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
analytical approach,fault-tolerant dynamic mpsoc,fault-mitigation schemes,analytical model,system performance,classical fault-tolerance solution,fault-tolerant dynamic multi-processor system-on-a-chip,computational power need,fault-tolerant mpsoc system,commercial fpgas,system computing power,fault-tolerant system,field programmable gate arrays,system on chip,nickel,fault tolerant system,fault tolerant,system on a chip,fpga,fault tolerance,synchronization | Synchronization,System on a chip,Computer science,Parallel computing,Field-programmable gate array,Real-time computing,Resist,Fault tolerance,Commercial off-the-shelf,Single event upset,MPSoC,Embedded system | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.37 | 2 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hung-Manh Pham | 1 | 17 | 2.80 |
| Sebastien Pillement | 2 | 25 | 3.74 |
| Didier Demigny | 3 | 67 | 12.53 |