Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Concurrent multipath transfer using SCTP multihoming: introducing the potentially-failed destination state |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Previously, we identified the failure-induced receive buffer (rbuf) blocking problem in Concurrent Multipath Transfer using SCTP multihoming (CMT), and proposed CMT with a Potentially-failed destination state (CMTPF) to alleviate rbuf blocking. In this paper, we complete our evaluation of CMT vs. CMT-PF. Using ns-2 simulations we show that CMT-PF performs on par or better than CMT during more aggressive failure detection thresholds than recommended by RFC4960. We also examine whether the modified sender behavior in CMT-PF degrades performance during non-failure scenarios. Our evaluations consider: (i) realistic loss model with symmetric and asymmetric path loss, (ii) varying path RTTs. We find that CMT-PF performs as well as CMT during non-failure scenarios, and interestingly, outperforms CMT when the paths experience asymmetric rbuf blocking conditions. We recommend that CMT be replaced by CMT-PF in future CMT implementations and RFCs. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2008 | Networking | cmt-pf degrades performance,realistic loss model,asymmetric rbuf,concurrent multipath transfer,asymmetric path loss,varying path rtts,proposed cmt,potentially-failed destination state,non-failure scenario,future cmt implementation,sctp multihoming,path loss,stream control transmission protocol |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Multipath propagation,Multihoming,Stream Control Transmission Protocol,Computer science,Computer network,Path loss | Conference | 4982 |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
0302-9743 | 3-540-79548-0 | 13 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.87 | 5 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preethi Natarajan | 1 | 221 | 12.49 |
| Nasif Ekiz | 2 | 65 | 5.36 |
| Paul D. Amer | 3 | 953 | 94.28 |
| Janardhan R. Iyengar | 4 | 601 | 39.81 |
| Randall Stewart | 5 | 159 | 11.95 |