Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Even though modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) support many refactorings, studies suggest that automated refactorings are used infrequently, and few developers use anything beyond Rename and Extract refactorings. Little is known about why automated refactorings are seldom used. We present a list of challenging questions whose answers are crucial for understanding the usability issues of refactoring tools. This paper argues that the existing data sources - Eclipse UDC, Eclipse refactoring histories, version control histories, etc. - are inadequate for answering these questions. Finally, we introduce our tools to collect richer usage data that will enable us to answer some of the open research questions about the usability of refactoring tools. Findings from our data will foster the design of the next generation of refactoring tools. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1145/2089155.2089164 | PLATEAU |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
automated refactorings,richer usage data,extract refactorings,eclipse udc,refactoring history,refactoring tool,modern integrated development environments,existing data source,richer refactoring usage data,usability issue,next generation,refactoring,measurement,human factors,usability,version control | Open research,World Wide Web,Programming language,Computer science,Usability,Eclipse,Usage data,Code refactoring,Rename | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
9 | 0.54 | 10 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Mohsen Vakilian | 1 | 162 | 7.62 |
Nicholas Chen | 2 | 57 | 3.58 |
Stas Negara | 3 | 218 | 9.23 |
Balaji Ambresh Rajkumar | 4 | 9 | 0.54 |
Roshanak Zilouchian Moghaddam | 5 | 53 | 4.18 |
Ralph E. Johnson | 6 | 1790 | 264.74 |