Paper Info
Title
Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
Abstract
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skepticism relation.
Year
DOI
Venue
2007
10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_21
ECSQARU
Keywords
Field
DocType
argumentation semantics,systematic comparison,strong skepticism relation,cf2 semantics,literature semantics,formalizing skepticism relation,significant set,skepticism
Operational semantics,Programming language,Computer science,Algorithm,Skepticism,Artificial intelligence,Argumentation semantics,Machine learning,Well-founded semantics,Semantics,Semantics of logic
Conference
Volume
ISSN
Citations 
4724
0302-9743
9
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.61
13
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Pietro Baroni172250.00
Massimiliano Giacomin278554.15