Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Many interpolation methods have been developed for high visual quality, but fail for preserving image structures. Edges carry heavy structural messages for visual tasks. Importance of edge preservation imposes edge-directed interpolation (EDI) methods a center of focus. How to measure edge-preserving ability has not been mentioned. In this paper, two metrics are proposed to measure the ability by edge-preserving ratio from accuracy and robustness. Performance of four edge-directed interpolation with two traditional methods are evaluated on two groups of standard images with other six commonly-used metrics. Experimental results show that EDI methods are better than traditional methods with highly improved edge-preserving ratio. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1145/2499788.2499859 | ICIMCS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
commonly-used metrics,noise-free image,visual task,edge-preserving ability,edge preservation,interpolation method,traditional method,edge-preserving ratio,high visual quality,performance evaluation,edi method,edge-directed interpolation method,edge-directed interpolation | Computer vision,Nearest-neighbor interpolation,Computer science,Interpolation,Stairstep interpolation,Robustness (computer science),Artificial intelligence,Bilinear interpolation | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.39 | 12 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Shaode Yu | 1 | 19 | 5.60 |
Rongmao Li | 2 | 2 | 0.39 |
Rui Zhang | 3 | 1208 | 67.26 |
Mou An | 4 | 2 | 0.73 |
Shibin Wu | 5 | 12 | 2.73 |
Yaoqin Xie | 6 | 125 | 21.70 |