Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Self-organizing teams are one of the critical success factors on Agile projects - and yet, little is known about the self-organizing nature of Agile teams and the challenges they face in industrial practice. Based on a Grounded Theory study of 40 Agile practitioners across 16 software development organizations in New Zealand and India, we describe how self-organizing Agile teams perform balancing acts between (a) freedom and responsibility (b) cross-functionality and specialization, and (c) continuous learning and iteration pressure, in an effort to maintain their self-organizing nature. We discuss the relationship between these three balancing acts and the fundamental conditions of self-organizing teams - autonomy, cross-fertilization, and self-transcendence. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1145/1833310.1833312 | CHASE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
agile practitioner,self-organizing nature,agile project,balancing act,agile tightrope,agile team,self-organizing agile team,new zealand,grounded theory study,continuous learning,self-organizing team,agile software development,software development,critical success factor,self organization,grounded theory,software engineering | Grounded theory,Critical success factor,Agile Unified Process,Systems engineering,Lean software development,Knowledge management,Agile software development,Agile usability engineering,Engineering,Empirical process (process control model),Software development | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
11 | 0.75 | 21 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Rashina Hoda | 1 | 267 | 24.27 |
James Noble | 2 | 1683 | 163.52 |
Stuart Marshall | 3 | 301 | 23.77 |