Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Understanding how behavior is controlled requires that modeling be combined with behavioral, electrophysiological, and neuroanatomical investigations. One problem in studying motor systems is that they have considerable autonomy; they are not driven solely by inputs. Choosing walking as the object of study is promising because it is a comparably simple and easy-to-elicit behavior, but it exhibits the special feature of most motor behavior—the interaction between central, autonomous components and peripheral, sensory influences. This article reviews the control of walking in stick insects, beginning with behavioral studies of single-leg control and the interleg coordinating mechanisms. These behavioral results are tested and supported by modeling the control system in an artificial neural network computer simulation and a six-legged robot. Supporting neurophysiological results also are considered. Together, the results indicate that the high flexibility and adaptability is based on a simple distributed control structure. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
1995 | 10.1177/105971239500300403 | Adaptive Behaviour |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
simple network,complex behavior,control system,motor control,artificial neural network,betweenness centrality,neural net,computer simulation,motor system | Adaptability,Neurophysiology,Computer science,Motor control,Artificial intelligence,Motor system,Control system,Artificial neural network,Robot,Sensory system | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
3 | 4 | 1059-7123 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
40 | 5.77 | 9 |
Authors | ||
7 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holk Cruse | 1 | 467 | 70.73 |
| Ch. Bartling | 2 | 40 | 5.77 |
| M. Dreifert | 3 | 40 | 5.77 |
| Josef Schmitz | 4 | 137 | 15.77 |
| D. E. Brunn | 5 | 40 | 5.77 |
| J. Dean | 6 | 40 | 5.77 |
| Jeffrey Dean | 7 | 11804 | 457.69 |