Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) have obvious value for Service-Oriented Computing and have received attention from both academics and industry. However, SLAs still lack a theoretical basis and effective techniques to facilitate automatic SLA establishment. In this paper, we classify negotiations into four types, and focus on the 1-to-1 Web services negotiation between a single service provider and a single service consumer. We make three contributions. Firstly, we represent the 1-to-1 Web services negotiation as a bargaining game. Here, we are interested in a bargain that takes into account the interests of both a service provider and a service consumer, in other words, a fair solution. Secondly, we determine a Nash equilibrium that can be regarded as the fair solution to a two-player bargaining game. We also determine the fair solution to the 1-to-1 Web services negotiation. Finally, we discuss issues that may arise with the 1-to-1 Web services negotiation under credible threats, incomplete information, time constraints, and multiple attributes. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/SCC.2010.54 | IEEE SCC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
two-player bargaining game,fair solution,bargaining game,web services,nash equilibrium,1-to-1 web services negotiation,service-oriented computing,game theory,service provider,service consumer,single service consumer,bargaining game theory,single service provider,sla establishment,web services negotiation,service level agreements,service oriented computing,web service,quality of service,games,incomplete information | Service level,Computer science,Knowledge management,Service provider,Game theory,Web service,Nash equilibrium,Service delivery framework,Service-oriented architecture,Negotiation | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-0-7695-4126-6 | 26 | 1.54 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xianrong Zheng | 1 | 137 | 8.58 |
Patrick Martin | 2 | 195 | 23.58 |
Wendy Powley | 3 | 329 | 28.43 |
Kathryn Brohman | 4 | 77 | 5.62 |