Title | ||
---|---|---|
Query by Humming by Using Locality Sensitive Hashing Based on Combination of Pitch and Note |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Query by humming (QBH) is a technique that is used for content-based music information retrieval. It is a challenging unsolved problem due to humming errors. In this paper a novel retrieval method called note-based locality sensitive hashing (NLSH) is presented and it is combined with pitch-based locality sensitive hashing (PLSH) to screen candidate fragments. The method extracts PLSH and NLSH vectors from the database to construct two indexes. In the phase of retrieval, it automatically extracts vectors similar to the index construction and searches the indexes to obtain a list of candidates. Then recursive alignment (RA) is executed on these surviving candidates. Experiments are conducted on a database of 5,000 MIDI files with the 2010 MIREX-QBH query corpus. The results show by using the combination approach the relatively improvements of mean reciprocal rank are 29.7% (humming from anywhere) and 23.8% (humming from beginning), respectively, compared with the current state-of-the-art method. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/ICMEW.2012.58 | ICME Workshops |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
nlsh vector,extracts vector,locality sensitive,challenging unsolved problem,midi file,content-based music information retrieval,novel retrieval method,candidate fragment,humming error,mirex-qbh query corpus,current state-of-the-art method,music,information retrieval,indexing,midi files,mean reciprocal rank,feature extraction,locality sensitive hashing,vectors,robustness,pitch | Locality-sensitive hashing,Music information retrieval,Pattern recognition,Computer science,MIDI,Speech recognition,Query by humming,Mean reciprocal rank,Hum,Artificial intelligence,Recursion | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2330-7927 | 4 | 0.47 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Qiang Wang | 1 | 26 | 4.55 |
Zhiyuan Guo | 2 | 30 | 5.35 |
Gang Liu | 3 | 11 | 2.01 |
Jun Guo | 4 | 1579 | 137.24 |
Yueming Lu | 5 | 129 | 40.73 |