Title | ||
---|---|---|
Investigating relationship between Landsat ETM+ data and LAI in a semi-arid grassland of Northwest China. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A field campaign was executed in a semi-arid grassland of northwest China from July 11th - July 15th, 2002. According to the VALERI (Validation of Land European Remote Sensing Instruments) sampling procedures, the leaf area index (LAI) were intensively measured within a homogenous 3×3 km2 square by using LAI-2000 and TRAC instrument. A quarter scene of Landsat7 ETM+ with acquisition times close to the field campaign time was processed by proper geo-registration and atmospheric correction. Three kinds of spectral vegetation index including NDVI, SR and MSAVI in the sampling area were derived from the corrected ETM+ image. The two sets of LAI data measured with LAI-2000 and TRAC instrument at the same site were inter-compared. The relationships between the measured LAI and vegetation indices were investigated as well. The results elicit that the statistical relationships between measured LAI and the different vegetation indices are consistent. Among them, NDVI seems the most promising estimator for the extraction of LAI. In addition, the LAI-2000 seems to perform better for LAI measurement in the semi-arid grassland than the TRAC instrument. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2004 | null | IGARSS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
etm+,semi-aridgrassland,northwest china,lai,leaf area index,data acquisition,sr,ndvi | Atmospheric correction,Leaf area index,Vegetation,Arid,Computer science,Remote sensing,Grassland,Normalized Difference Vegetation Index,Sampling (statistics),TRAC | Conference |
Volume | Issue | Citations |
6 | null | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.39 | 1 | 9 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Ling Lu | 1 | 24 | 4.25 |
Xuanqi Li | 2 | 2 | 1.47 |
Mingguo Ma | 3 | 135 | 25.69 |
Tao Che | 4 | 30 | 8.66 |
Chunlin Huang | 5 | 36 | 7.22 |
Frank Veroustraete | 6 | 38 | 5.01 |
Qinghan Dong | 7 | 1 | 1.74 |
Reinhart Ceulemans | 8 | 1 | 0.39 |
Jan Bogaert | 9 | 18 | 4.44 |