Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The process industry has always been faced with the difficult task of determining the required integrity of safeguarding systems such as safety instrumented systems (SISs). The ANSI/ISA S84.01-1996 and IEC 61508 safety standards provide guidelines for the design, installation, operation, maintenance, and test of SIS. However, in the field, there is a considerable lack of understanding of how to apply these standards to both determine and achieve the required safety integrity level (SIL) for SIS. Moreover, in certain situations, the SIL evaluation is further complicated due to the uncertainty on reliability parameters of SIS components. This paper proposes a new approach to evaluate the ldquoconfidencerdquo of the SIL determination when there is an uncertainty about failure rates of SIS components. This approach is based on the use of failure rates and fuzzy probabilities to evaluate the SIS failure probability on demand and the SIL of the SIS. Furthermore, we provide guidance on reducing the SIL uncertainty based on fuzzy probabilistic importance measures. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.903328 | IEEE T. Fuzzy Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
sis failure probability,fuzzy probabilistic approach,sil uncertainty,safety standard,safety instrumented system,fuzzy probabilistic importance measure,sil determination,sil evaluation,failure rate,sis component,safety integrity level,required safety integrity level,chemical industry,fuzzy systems,safety instrumented systems,probability,testing,safety systems,uncertainty,fuzzy set theory,instruction sets,reliability | Computer security,Fuzzy set,Artificial intelligence,Fuzzy control system,Probabilistic logic,Safety instrumented system,Safety standards,System safety,IEC 61508,Fuzzy logic,Mathematics,Reliability engineering,Machine learning | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
16 | 1 | 1063-6706 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
19 | 0.92 | 5 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Sallak | 1 | 19 | 1.25 |
| Christophe Simon | 2 | 162 | 14.35 |
| J. -F. Aubry | 3 | 19 | 0.92 |