Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In general, video quality adaptation and video quality evaluation are distinct activities. Most adaptive delivery mechanisms for streaming multimedia content do not explicitly consider user-perceived quality when making adaptation decisions. Equally, video quality evaluation techniques are not designed to evaluate instantaneous quality where the quality is changing over time. We propose that an Optimal Adaptation Trajectory (OAT) through the set of possible encoding exists, and that it indicates how to adapt encoding quality in response to changes in network conditions in order to maximize user-perceived quality. The subjective and objective tests carried out to find such trajectories for a number of different MPEG-4 video clips are described. Experimental subjective testing results are presented that demonstrate the dynamic nature of user perception with adapting multimedia. The results demonstrate that adaptation using the OAT out-performs conventional adaptation strategies in which only a single aspect of the video quality is adapted. In contrast, the OAT provides a mechanism to adapt multiple aspects of the video quality thereby giving better user-perceived quality in both the short and long term. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.12.002 | International Journal of Man-Machine Studies |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
video quality evaluation,conventional adaptation strategy,perception,video quality,mpeg-4 video clip,adaptation decision,adaptation,video quality evaluation technique,user perception,evaluation/methodology,video quality adaptation,encoding quality,instantaneous quality,user-perceived quality,subjective and objective quality | Computer science,Decision support system,Image quality,Subjective video quality,Human–computer interaction,Objective test,User interface,Perception,Video quality,Encoding (memory) | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
64 | 8 | 1071-5819 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
65 | 3.84 | 15 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicola Cranley | 1 | 148 | 12.90 |
| Philip Perry | 2 | 353 | 29.95 |
| Liam Murphy | 3 | 811 | 74.94 |