Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Some thirty years ago, two proposals were made concerning criteria for identity of proofs. Prawitz proposed to analyze identity of proofs in terms of the equivalence relation based on reduction to normal form in natural deduction. Lambek worked on a normalization proposal analogous to Prawitzs, based on reduction to cut-free form in sequent systems, but he also suggested understanding identity of proofs in terms of an equivalence relation based on generality, two derivations having the same generality if after generalizing maximally the rules involved in them they yield the same premises and conclusions up to a renaming of variables. These two proposals proved to be extensionally equivalent only for limited fragments of logic. The normalization proposal stands behind very successful applications of the typed lambda calculus and of category theory in the proof theory of intuitionistic logic. In classical logic, however, it did not fare well. The generality proposal was rather neglected in logic, though related matters were much studied in pure category theory in connection with coherence problems, and there are also links to low-dimensional topology and linear algebra. This proposal seems more promising than the other one for the general proof theory of classical logic. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2003 | 10.2178/bsl/1067620091 | BULLETIN OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
proof,criteria of identity,cut elimination and normal form,generality,categorial coherence | Intuitionistic logic,Discrete mathematics,Natural deduction,Proof theory,Mathematical proof,Classical logic,Sequent,Category theory,Mathematics,Generality | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
9 | 4 | 1079-8986 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
17 | 1.23 | 15 |
Authors | ||
1 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kosta Dosen | 1 | 143 | 25.45 |