Title
Comparison of NN and LR classifiers in the context of screening native American elders with diabetes
Abstract
Classification is a frequently used decision making tool, however there are many classification methods and these seldom provide adequate and consistent results. In this paper we compare the classification efficiency of neural networks (NN) to more traditional methods such as LR (LR), in the context of identifying American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) elders who are at risk of developing diabetes. Feature selection is an important first step in building these classification models. We used both stepwise selection and genetic algorithm (GA) to identify features related to diabetes. Each LR and NN models were built twice, once based features identified by stepwise regression and second using features identified using genetic algorithm. Analysis of results from this approach lead to several conclusions: (a) although both LR and NN models exhibit similar classification ability, NN models were marginally better compared to LR models. (b) While the ROC value of these two models were the same (ROC=1), the type of feature selection methodology had no impact on the sensitivity and specificity of these models. In conclusion results from our study shows that although both these models are equally capable of identifying AI/AN elders at risk of developing diabetes, NN models are marginally better.
Year
DOI
Venue
2013
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.012
Expert Syst. Appl.
Keywords
Field
DocType
feature selection,nn model,classification model,classification method,genetic algorithm,stepwise selection,native american elder,classification efficiency,lr model,lr classifier,similar classification ability,feature selection methodology,diabetes,artificial neural network,stepwise regression,logistic regression
Data mining,Stepwise regression,Feature selection,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Artificial intelligence,Artificial neural network,Logistic regression,Genetic algorithm,Machine learning
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
40
15
0957-4174
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
4
0.45
18
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
S. Upadhyaya1817.01
Kambiz Farahmand2247.08
T. Baker-Demaray340.45