Title | ||
---|---|---|
A resource management framework for multi-tier service delivery in autonomic virtualized environments. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Large data centers usually host many different services on a shared computing infrastructure, for which on-demand resource management is necessary to maximize providers' revenues by meeting service quality targets at least operational cost. This paper presents a novel architecture of autonomic resource management framework based on virtualized Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) environment. A non-linear continuous optimization problem is defined for adaptive resource allocation and a model-based approach is adopted to solve this problem. Different from traditional approaches, the analytic model we established provides probabilistic performance guarantees and considers non-steady-state behavior assisted by admission control. Results of prototype experiments demonstrate that the performance of multiple services has been greatly improved by taking advantage of fine-grained resource sharing, while incurring much lower resource usage cost Also, differentiated service qualifies could be provided to different client classes through our dynamic resource allocation scheme. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/NOMS.2008.4575149 | NOMS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
local area networks,steady state,service delivery,service oriented computing,autonomic computing,java,web server,virtual environment,resource allocation,quality of service,resource sharing,service quality,resource management,resource manager,continuous optimization,differentiated service | Resource management,Autonomic computing,Service quality,Computer science,Quality of service,Computer network,Human resource management system,Differentiated service,Resource allocation,Shared resource,Distributed computing | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
null | null | null |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-2066-7 | 14 | 1.31 |
References | Authors | |
15 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xiaoying Wang | 1 | 115 | 13.21 |
Dongjun Lan | 2 | 109 | 9.64 |
Xing Fang | 3 | 283 | 26.18 |
Ye, M. | 4 | 47 | 3.10 |
Ying Chen | 5 | 361 | 34.10 |