Title | ||
---|---|---|
Comparison of the Applicability of Rule-Based and Self-Organizing Fuzzy Logic Controllers for Sedation Control of Intracranial Pressure Pattern in a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper assesses the controller performance of a self-organizing fuzzy logic controller (SOFLC) in comparison with a routine clinical rule-base controller (RBC) for sedation control of intracranial pressure (ICP) pattern. Eleven patients with severe head injury undergoing different neurosurgeries in a neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) were divided into two groups. In all cases the sedition control periods lasted 1 h and assessments of propofol infusion rates were made at a frequency of once per 30 s. In the control group of 10 cases selected from 5 patients, a RBC was used, and in the experimental group of 10 cases selected from 6 patients, a self-organizing fuzzy logic controller was used. A SOFLC was derived from a fuzzy logic controller and allowed to generate new rules via self-learning beyond the initial fuzzy rule-base obtained from experts (i.e., neurosurgeons). The performance of the controllers was analyzed using the ICP pattern of sedation for 1 h of control. The results show that a SOFLC can provide a more stable ICP pattern by administering more propofol and changing the rate of delivery more often when rule-base modifications have been considered. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1109/TBME.2006.873757 | IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
surgery,unsupervised learning,control group,fuzzy control,self organization,neurophysiology,rule based | Intensive care unit,Propofol,Control theory,Computer science,Fuzzy logic,Anesthesia,Intracranial pressure,Fuzzy control system,Intensive care,Sedation | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
53 | 8 | 0018-9294 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.48 | 5 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jiann Shing Shieh | 1 | 224 | 28.44 |
Mu Fu | 2 | 5 | 0.48 |
Sheng-Jean Huang | 3 | 23 | 2.35 |
Ming-Chien Kao | 4 | 5 | 0.48 |