Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we compare the battery power efficiencies of various pulse-based modulations widely adopted for their low complexity. Taking into account circuit modules and battery imperfectness, we establish simple closed-form analytical formulas which can be used to conveniently determine the relative preference between arbitrary pulse-based modulation pairs in terms of their actual average battery energy consumption. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/TCOMM.2010.07.080443 | IEEE Transactions on Communications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
simple closed-form analytical formula,actual average battery energy,battery imperfectness,modulation selection,low complexity,various pulse-based modulation,relative preference,account circuit module,battery power efficiency perspective,arbitrary pulse-based modulation pair,battery power efficiency,wireless communication,modulation,bit error rate,power efficiency,pulse width modulation,wireless sensor networks,frequency shift keying,pulse modulation | Electrical efficiency,Frequency-shift keying,Computer science,Control theory,Pulse-width modulation,Modulation,Electronic engineering,Battery (electricity),Energy consumption,Modulation (music),Bit error rate | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
58 | 7 | 0090-6778 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
6 | 0.61 | 8 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Dongliang Duan | 1 | 128 | 16.45 |
Fengzhong Qu | 2 | 196 | 19.02 |
Liuqing Yang | 3 | 2238 | 189.17 |
Swami, A. | 4 | 5105 | 566.62 |
Jose C. Principe | 5 | 2295 | 282.29 |