Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The Common Component Architecture (CCA) provides a means for software developers to manage the complexity of large-scale scientific simulations and to move toward a plug-and-play environment for high-performance coputing. In the scientific computing context, component models also promote collaboration using independently developed software, thereby allowing particular individals or groups to focus on the aspects of greatest interest to them. The CCA supports parallel and distributed coputing as well as local high-performance connections between components in a language-independent manner. The design places minimal requirements on components and thus facilitates the integration of existing code into the CCA environment. The CCA model imposes minimal ovehead to minimize the impact on application performance. The focus on high performance distinguishes the CCA from most other component models. The CCA is being applied within an increasing range of disciplines, including cobustion research, global climate simulation, and computtional chemistry. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1177/1094342006064488 | IJHPCA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
parallel com- puting,cca environment,high-performance coputing,component architecture,climate modeling,minimal requirement,minimal ovehead,combustion mode- ling,quantum chemistry,application performance,cca model,local high-performance connection,high-performance scientific computing,large-scale scientific simulation,high performance,component model,computational chemistry,parallel computing,common component architecture,software development,scientific computing | Global climate,Architecture,Computer science,Parallel computing,Common Component Architecture,Theoretical computer science,Software,Computational science,Distributed computing | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
20 | 2 | 1094-3420 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
91 | 6.37 | 44 |
Authors | ||
26 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin A. Allan | 1 | 216 | 18.40 |
| Robert Armstrong | 2 | 91 | 6.37 |
| David E. Bernholdt | 3 | 397 | 43.06 |
| Felipe Bertrand | 4 | 193 | 20.21 |
| Kenneth Chiu | 5 | 343 | 36.27 |
| Tamara L. Dahlgren | 6 | 91 | 6.37 |
| Kostadin Damevski | 7 | 254 | 26.07 |
| Wael R. Elwasif | 8 | 158 | 17.86 |
| Thomas G. W. Epperly | 9 | 91 | 6.37 |
| Madhusudhan Govindaraju | 10 | 854 | 96.53 |
| Daniel S. Katz | 11 | 1496 | 121.04 |
| James A. Kohl | 12 | 136 | 10.14 |
| Manoj Krishnan | 13 | 116 | 9.94 |
| Gary Kumfert | 14 | 173 | 21.02 |
| J. Walter Larson | 15 | 109 | 10.50 |
| Sophia Lefantzi | 16 | 116 | 11.15 |
| Michael J. Lewis | 17 | 673 | 94.68 |
| Allen D. Malony | 18 | 1787 | 190.85 |
| Lois C. Mclnnes | 19 | 91 | 6.37 |
| Jarek Nieplocha | 20 | 928 | 87.43 |
| Boyana Norris | 21 | 417 | 39.46 |
| Steven G. Parker | 22 | 1323 | 116.91 |
| Jaideep Ray | 23 | 198 | 24.42 |
| Sameer Shende | 24 | 1351 | 116.40 |
| Theresa L. Windus | 25 | 229 | 30.66 |
| Shujia Zhou | 26 | 216 | 17.50 |