Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Query evaluation in tuple-independent probabilistic databases is the problem of computing the probability of an answer to a query given independent probabilities of the individual tuples in a database instance. There are two main approaches to this problem: (1) in `grounded inference' one first obtains the lineage for the query and database instance as a Boolean formula, then performs weighted model counting on the lineage (i.e., computes the probability of the lineage given probabilities of its independent Boolean variables); (2) in methods known as `lifted inference' or `extensional query evaluation', one exploits the high-level structure of the query as a first-order formula. Although it is widely believed that lifted inference is strictly more powerful than grounded inference on the lineage alone, no formal separation has previously been shown for query evaluation. In this paper we show such a formal separation for the first time. We exhibit a class of queries for which model counting can be done in polynomial time using extensional query evaluation, whereas the algorithms used in state-of-the-art exact model counters on their lineages provably require exponential time. Our lower bounds on the running times of these exact model counters follow from new exponential size lower bounds on the kinds of d-DNNF representations of the lineages that these model counters (either explicitly or implicitly) produce. Though some of these queries have been studied before, no non-trivial lower bounds on the sizes of these representations for these queries were previously known. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2013 | CoRR | Data mining,Computer science,Theoretical computer science,Probabilistic logic,Boolean data type,True quantified Boolean formula,Time complexity,Query optimization,Tuple,Inference,Algorithm,Boolean conjunctive query,Database |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1312.4125 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.38 | 19 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Beame | 1 | 2234 | 176.07 |
| Jerry Li | 2 | 229 | 22.67 |
| Sudeepa Roy | 3 | 268 | 30.95 |
| Dan Suciu | 4 | 9625 | 1349.54 |