Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we discuss the mathematical foundations of SOA sensitivity analysis and show that it provides an efficient approach to obtain Hessian-vector products. We study the benefits of using second-order information in the numerical optimization process for data assimilation applications. The numerical studies are performed in a twin experiment setting with a two-dimensional shallow water model. Different scenarios are considered with different discretization approaches, observation sets, and noise levels. Optimization algorithms that employ second-order derivatives are tested against widely used methods that require only first-order derivatives. Conclusions are drawn regarding the potential benefits and the limitations of using high-order information in large-scale data assimilation problems. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1080/10556788.2011.610455 | Optimization Methods and Software |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
numerical study,data assimilation application,optimization algorithm,numerical optimization process,second-order derivative,different discretization approach,pde-constrained optimization problem,high-order information,assimilation problem,different scenario,large-scale data,second-order adjoints,inverse problems,first order,shallow water equation,quasi newton method,shallow water,conjugate gradient,data assimilation,inverse problem,shallow water equations,second order,cost function,optimization problem,optimal estimation,constrained optimization,numerical analysis,partial differential equation,sensitivity analysis | Discretization,Mathematical optimization,Mathematical software,Optimization algorithm,Inverse problem,Data assimilation,Constrained optimization problem,Numerical analysis,Shallow water equations,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
27 | 4-5 | 1055-6788 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
7 | 0.73 | 19 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Alexandru Cioaca | 1 | 16 | 3.39 |
Mihai Alexe | 2 | 29 | 3.48 |
Adrian Sandu | 3 | 325 | 58.93 |