Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We focus on the strategy problem arising as a manager faces situations involving a choice between a finite set of strategies, having access to a finite set of agents reporting their opinions. The most preferred strategy is determined from the agents' individual opinions and the relative credibility of each agent. The evaluation method used is primarily based on the principle of maximising the expected utility. The evaluation results in a set of admissible strategies. These strategies can be further investigated with respect to their relative strengths and also with respect to the number of values consistent with the given domain that make them admissible. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1994 | 10.1007/3-540-61157-6_21 | MAAMAW |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
multi-agent systems,handling uncertain information,multi agent system,expected utility | Data mining,Mathematical optimization,Finite set,Credibility,Expected utility hypothesis,Computer science,Multi-agent system | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
3-540-61157-6 | 3 | 1.59 |
References | Authors | |
2 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
love ekenberg | 1 | 287 | 51.71 |
Mats Danielson | 2 | 229 | 37.89 |
Magnus Boman | 3 | 227 | 49.08 |