Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are not uniformly successful in influencing clinicians' behaviour toward best practices. Implementability refers to a set of characteristics that predict ease of (and obstacles to) guideline implementation. Our objective is to develop and validate a tool for appraisal of implementability of clinical guidelines. METHODS: Indicators of implementability were identified from the literature and used to create items and dimensions of the GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA). GLIA consists of 31 items, arranged into 10 dimensions. Questions from 9 of the 10 dimensions are applied individually to each recommendation of the guideline. Decidability and Executability are critical dimensions. Other dimensions are Global, Presentation and Formatting, Measurable Outcomes, Apparent Validity, Flexibility, Effect on Process of Care, Novelty/Innovation, and Computability. We conducted a series of validation activities, including validation of the construct of implementability, expert review of content for clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness, and assessment of construct validity of the instrument. Finally, GLIA was applied to a draft guideline under development by national professional societies. RESULTS: Evidence of content validity and preliminary support for construct validity were obtained. The GLIA proved to be useful in identifying barriers to implementation in the draft guideline and the guideline was revised accordingly. CONCLUSION: GLIA may be useful to guideline developers who can apply the results to remedy defects in their guidelines. Likewise, guideline implementers may use GLIA to select implementable recommendations and to devise implementation strategies that address identified barriers. By aiding the design and operationalization of highly implementable guidelines, our goal is that application of GLIA may help to improve health outcomes, but further evaluation will be required to support this potential benefit. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2005 | 10.1186/1472-6947-5-23 | BMC Med. Inf. & Decision Making |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
medical,health informatics,informatics,and,critical dimension,construct validity,best practice | Best practice,Expert system,Clinical Practice,Knowledge management,Guideline,Health informatics,Valuation (finance),Medicine,Benchmarking | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
5 | 1 | 1472-6947 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
13 | 1.92 | 1 |
Authors | ||
7 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard N. Shiffman | 1 | 124 | 26.09 |
| Jane Dixon | 2 | 13 | 1.92 |
| Cynthia Brandt | 3 | 231 | 43.89 |
| Abdelwaheb Essaihi | 4 | 22 | 3.23 |
| Allen Hsiao | 5 | 13 | 1.92 |
| George Michel | 6 | 54 | 6.80 |
| Ryan T. O'Connell | 7 | 13 | 1.92 |