Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Objective image/video quality metrics which accurately represent the subjective quality of processed images are of paramount importance for the design and assessment of an image compression and transmission system. In some scenarios, it is also important to evaluate the quality of the received image with minimal reference to the transmitted one. For instance, for closed-loop optimization of a transmission system, the image quality measure can be evaluated at the receiver and provided as feedback information to the system controller. The original image - prior to compression and transmission - is not usually available at the receiver side, and it is important to rely at the receiver side on an objective quality metric that does not need reference or needs minimal reference to the original image. The observation that the human eye is very sensitive to edge and contour information of an image underpins the proposal of our reduced reference (RR) quality metric, which compares edge information between the distorted and the original image. Results highlight that the metric correlates well with subjective observations, also in comparison with commonly used full-reference metrics and with a state-of-the-art reduced reference metric. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1016/j.image.2012.01.012 | Sig. Proc.: Image Comm. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
edge preservation,transmission system,objective quality metric,quality metric,objective image,image quality measure,minimal reference,image compression,image quality assessment,processed image,receiver side,original image,edge detection | Computer vision,Feature detection (computer vision),Edge detection,Computer science,Image processing,Image quality,Subjective video quality,Transmission system,Artificial intelligence,Video quality,Image compression | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
27 | 8 | 0923-5965 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.41 | 13 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maria G. Martini | 1 | 498 | 57.74 |
| Chaminda T. E. R. Hewage | 2 | 296 | 22.53 |
| Barbara Villarini | 3 | 17 | 4.13 |