Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In this paper, a new approach to working with missing attribute values in inductive learning algorithms is introduced. Three fundamental issues are studied: the splitting criterion, the allocation of values to missing attribute values, and the prediction of new observations. The formal definition for the splitting criterion is given. This definition takes into account the missing attribute values and generalizes the classical definition. In relation to the second objective, multiple values are assigned to missing attribute values using a decision theory approach. Each of these multiple values will have an associated confidence and error parameter. The error parameter measures how near or how far the value is from the original value of the attribute. After applying a splitting criterion, a decision tree is obtained (from training sets with or without missing attribute values). This decision tree can be used to predict the class of an observation (with or without missing attribute values). Hence, there are four perspectives. The three perspectives with missing attribute values are studied and experimental results are presented. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.02.013 | Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
data mining,missing attribute,error parameter measure,missing values,decision theory,formal definition,classical definition,decision theory approach,decision tree,machine learning,missing value,splitting criterion,error parameter,missing attribute value,multiple value | Decision tree,Mathematical optimization,Variable and attribute,Algorithm,Formal description,Learning models,Decision theory,Imputation (statistics),Missing data,Statistics,Mathematics,Attribute domain | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
44 | 9-10 | Mathematical and Computer Modelling |
Citations | PageRank | References |
9 | 0.78 | 15 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inmaculada Fortes Ruiz | 1 | 29 | 2.97 |
| L. Mora-López | 2 | 23 | 3.07 |
| Rafael Morales | 3 | 54 | 9.33 |
| Francisco Triguero Ruiz | 4 | 174 | 26.63 |