Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
An instance of the max k−cut game is an edge weighted graph Every vertex is controlled by an autonomous agent with strategy space [1..k] Given a player i, his payoff is defined as the total weight of the edges [i,j] such that player j's strategy is different from player i's strategy The social welfare is defined as the weight of the cut, i.e half the sum of the players payoff It is known that this game always has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium, a state from which no single player can deviate Instead we focus on strong equilibria, a robust refinement of the pure Nash equilibrium which is resilient to deviations by coalitions of any size We study the strong equilibria of the max k−cut game under two perspectives: existence and worst case social welfare compared to a social optimum. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_22 | TAMC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
strong equilibrium,nash equilibrium,max k-cut game,max k,cut game,player i,player j,social welfare,strategy space,pure strategy,single player,autonomous agent,pure strategy nash equilibrium | Correlated equilibrium,Combinatorics,Mathematical economics,Risk dominance,Epsilon-equilibrium,Strategy,Best response,Repeated game,Normal-form game,Nash equilibrium,Mathematics | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
6108 | 0302-9743 | 3-642-13561-7 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.47 | 9 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Laurent Gourvès | 1 | 241 | 30.97 |
Jérôme Monnot | 2 | 512 | 55.74 |