Title | ||
---|---|---|
Finding Determinants Affecting Distance Education Effectiveness in Terms of Learner Satisfaction and Application Achievement |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Distance education has become an important method of extending education to populations that otherwise might be educationally neglected. Distance education in the private sector provides learners with more educational opportunities and widens the range of innovative services with a one-stop educational solution. With distance education, learners can undertake customized education on a more ubiquitous scale. Additionally, information technology allows both trainers and learners to work independently, free from the constraints of location. This study selected the determinants of educational effectiveness from previous literature regarding traditional educational environments, and empirically tested the authors' hypotheses to examine factors that affected educational effectiveness in terms of learner satisfaction and application performance using a structural equation model. Results show that factors in traditional education are still significant in terms of application performance while certain factors in distance education affect learner satisfaction. The authors expect that this research can serve as a guideline for distance education in the private sector. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.4018/jwltt.2010040102 | IJWLTT |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
distance education,one-stop educational solution,Education Effectiveness,Finding Determinants Affecting Distance,application performance,traditional educational environment,certain factor,private sector,traditional education,Application Achievement,educational effectiveness,Learner Satisfaction,educational opportunity,learner satisfaction | Journal | 5 |
Issue | Citations | PageRank |
2 | 1 | 0.38 |
References | Authors | |
13 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jeongwook Kim | 1 | 83 | 8.15 |
Kyung Hoon Yang | 2 | 38 | 4.52 |
Kichan Nam | 3 | 492 | 39.22 |
Sung-Tae Kim | 4 | 63 | 8.83 |