Title | ||
---|---|---|
User-centered Design in Clinical Handover: Exploring Post-Implementation Outcomes for Clinicians. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper examines the outcomes for clinicians from their involvement in the development of an electronic clinical handover tool developed using principles of user-centered design. Conventional e-health post-implementation evaluations tend to emphasize technology-related (mostly positive) outcomes. More recently, unintended (mostly negative) consequences arising from the implementation of e-health technologies have also been reported. There remains limited focus on the post-implementation outcomes for users, particularly those directly involved in e-health design processes. This paper presents detailed analysis and insights into the outcomes experienced post-implementation by a cohort of junior clinicians involved in developing an electronic clinical handover tool in Tasmania, Australia. The qualitative methods used included observations, semi-structured interviews and analysis of clinical handover notes. Significantly, a number of unanticipated flow-on effects were identified that mitigated some of the challenges arising during the design and implementation of the tool. The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of identifying post-implementation user outcomes beyond conventional system adoption and use and also points to the need for more comprehensive evaluative frameworks to encapsulate these broader socio-technical user outcomes. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-253 | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
User-centered design,Health information technology | Patient Handoff,Health information technology,Knowledge management,Qualitative research,Medicine,Clinical handover,User-centered design | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
192 | 0926-9630 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.48 | 8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Ming Chao Wong | 1 | 6 | 6.42 |
Elizabeth Cummings | 2 | 14 | 9.86 |
Paul Turner | 3 | 31 | 7.53 |