Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In vivo observation and tracking of cell division in the Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem, by time-lapse confocal microscopy, is central to biology research. The research herein described is based on large amount of image data, which must be analyzed to determine the location and state of cells. The possibility of automating the process of cell detection/marking is an important step to provide research tools to the biologists in order to ease the search for a special event as cell division. This paper discusses an automatic cell segmentation method, which selects the best cell candidates from a starting watershed based image segmentation. The selection of individual cells is obtained using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, based on the shape and edge strength of the cells' contour. The resulting segmentation is largely pruned of badly segmented cells, which can reduce the false positive detection of cell division. This is a good result on its own and a starting point for improvement of cell segmentation methodology. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541095 | ISBI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
confocal microscopy images,image processing,cellular biophysics,biomedical optical imaging,biological cells,image segmentation,biomedical image processing,cell division,arabidopsis thaliana root meristem,support vector machine,watershed based image segmentation,cell contour,automatic cell segmentation,medical image processing,false positive,microscopy,in vivo,shape,confocal microscopy,image analysis,support vector machines | Cell division,Computer vision,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Segmentation,Support vector machine,Image processing,Image segmentation,Artificial intelligence,Classifier (linguistics),Confocal microscopy,Meristem | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1945-7928 | 978-1-4244-2003-2 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.41 | 5 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Marcuzzo | 1 | 81 | 5.53 |
| Pedro Quelhas | 2 | 261 | 21.51 |
| Ana Campilho | 3 | 1 | 0.41 |
| Ana Maria Mendonça | 4 | 661 | 43.86 |
| Aurélio J. C. Campilho | 5 | 321 | 40.49 |