Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Although next-generation information network infrastructure is prerequisite for continued economic growth, the United States is falling behind in this area relative to many other countries. Businesses and regulators have grown concerned that the U.S. lacks the correct regulatory and business incentives to upgrade its network. Due to the complex and dynamic nature of this problem, traditional analytic tools have proven inadequate. This paper discusses a Genetic Programming (GP) approach to the problem. Although only a first step towards addressing the problem, the GP discovered several interesting results stemming from the complex interactions. For example, telecommunications companies would actually be hurt by the option to charge discriminatory prices but application providers would benefit. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/HICSS.2010.14 | HICSS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
united states,genetic programming,application provider,complex interaction,genetic programming approach,next-generation information network infrastructure,discriminatory price,dynamic nature,interesting result,continued economic growth,business incentive,network management regulation,genetic algorithms,mathematical model,network management,next generation networking,economics,economic growth,telecommunication services,commerce,telecommunications,elasticity | Next-generation network,Incentive,Computer science,Knowledge management,Risk analysis (engineering),Upgrade,Genetic programming,Network management,Telecommunications service,Genetic algorithm,Marketing | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
1060-3425 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
3 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Kurt DeMaagd | 1 | 15 | 4.30 |
Johannes M. Bauer | 2 | 50 | 7.40 |