Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper we report the results of an empirical study to compare eleven alternative logics for approximate reasoning in expert systems. The several “compositional inference” axiom systems (described below) were used in an expert knowledge-based system. The quality of the system outputs—fuzzy linguistic phrases—were compared in terms of correctness and precision (non-vagueness). |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1985 | 10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80007-9 | International Journal of Man-Machine Studies |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
comparative study,expert system | Non-classical logic,Computer science,Inference,Axiom,Expert system,Correctness,Model-based reasoning,Artificial intelligence,Empirical research,Legal expert system | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
22 | 3 | 0020-7373 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
13 | 2.69 | 2 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Thomas Whalen | 1 | 115 | 32.39 |
Brian Schott | 2 | 13 | 2.69 |