Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper we describe our experience deriving evaluation metrics for a systems-level framework called Ripple that connects software engineering and usability engineering life cycles. This evaluation was conducted with eight teams of graduate students (falling under four types of development models) competing in a joint software engineering and usability engineering course to create a software solution for a real world client. We describe the challenges of evaluating systems-level frameworks and the approach we used to derive metrics given our evaluation context. We conclude with the outcome of this evaluation and the effectiveness of the metrics we employed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_34 | HCI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
evaluation metrics,usability engineering life cycle,systems-level framework,evaluation context,joint software engineering,graduate student,development model,usability engineering course,software engineering,systems-level evaluation effort,software solution,goal question metric,life cycle,usability engineering | GQM,Software engineering,Systems engineering,Usability engineering,Heuristic evaluation,Computer science,Usability,Usability goals,Component-based usability testing,System usability scale,Social software engineering | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
5619 | 0302-9743 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 6 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Pardha S. Pyla | 1 | 123 | 9.22 |
H. Rex Hartson | 2 | 873 | 553.53 |
perez quinones | 3 | 651 | 87.57 |
James D. Arthur | 4 | 242 | 28.49 |
Tonya L. Smith-jackson | 5 | 75 | 9.22 |
Deborah Hix | 6 | 1028 | 136.87 |