Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Rejoinder---Causes and Implications of Some Bidders Not Conforming to the Sealed-Bid Abstraction |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper presents the authors' rejoinder to Zeithammer and Adams [Zeithammer, R., C. Adams. 2010. The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci.29(6) 964--987]. This rejoinder clarifies and qualifies conclusions of the original paper and makes suggestions for fruitful areas of future research. In particular, the original paper shows that bidding style can make a big difference in managerial decisions, but a structural model would be necessary to make confident predictions under different reserve prices. The rejoinder also clarifies the interpretation of feedback as a measure of bidder experience, and the relationship between bidder experience and bidding style. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1287/mksc.1100.0597 | Marketing Science |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
big difference,fruitful area,confident prediction,marketing sci,different reserve price,bidding style,sealed-bid abstraction,original paper,c. adams,bidder experience,auctions,econometrics | Economics,Abstraction,Microeconomics,Common value auction,Bidding,Marketing | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
29 | 6 | 0732-2399 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 3 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Zeithammer | 1 | 31 | 5.11 |
| Christopher Adams | 2 | 24 | 3.17 |