Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
C++ based verification methodologies are now emerging as the preferred method for SOC design. However most of the verification involving the C++ models are simulation based. The challenge of using C++ for sequential equivalence checking comes from two aspects (1) Language constructs such as pointers, polymorphism, virtual methods, dynamic memory allocation, dynamic loop bounds, floating points pose difficulty in creating a model suitable for equivalence checking (2) The memory and runtime required for creating models suitable for equivalence checking from practical C++ designs is huge. In this paper we describe techniques for constructing verification models from C++ designs containing a very rich set of language constructs. The flow is built keeping in mind that formal methods are inherently capacity constrained but need to be applied to large C++ designs to have practical value. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1145/1391469.1391707 | Anaheim, CA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
dynamic memory allocation,language construct,dynamic loop bound,equivalence checking,sequential equivalence checking,practical value,verification methodology,concrete verification model,large c,verification model,practical c,system on chip,testing,floating points,pointers,construction industry,automata,floating point,computational modeling,polymorphism,formal verification,hardware,design methodology,logic design,indexes,dynamic scheduling,concrete,c,formal methods,resource management,computer architecture | Formal equivalence checking,Pointer (computer programming),Programming language,C dynamic memory allocation,Computer science,Floating point,Language construct,Automaton,Theoretical computer science,Formal methods,Formal verification | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
0738-100X | 978-1-60558-115-6 | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.47 | 5 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malay Haldar | 1 | 98 | 10.78 |
| Gagandeep Singh | 2 | 9 | 2.48 |
| Saurabh Prabhakar | 3 | 2 | 0.47 |
| Basant Dwivedi | 4 | 2 | 0.47 |
| Antara Ghosh | 5 | 21 | 1.93 |