Title
An inherent limitation of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence retrieval at the o-{2}\hbox{-a} absorption feature in high-altitude areas
Abstract
The Fraunhofer line discriminator (FLD) principle applied on the atmospheric oxygen absorption feature around 761 nm (O-2-A band) has been widely used to retrieve solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (F-s) from remotely sensed data. In this letter, however, we address a violation of the basic assumption caused by O-2 absorption feature changes, and we evaluate the impact of diminishing O-2 absorption with the increase in ground altitude on Fs retrieval accuracy. The Fs retrieval accuracy substantially decreases in higher ground altitude areas for the standard FLD and three-band FLD methods, in which relative estimation errors increase approximately 70%-80% and 10%-16%, respectively, with an increase in ground altitude from 0.01 to 4.5 km. However, this increasing trend in Fs retrieval error does not occur with the use of the improved FLD (iFLD) method, which exhibits smaller than 5% of changes in relative estimation errors. Analytical analyses reveal the causes of the changes in Fs retrieval accuracy by the three methods. Based on these findings, the iFLD method is recommended to be used in cross-altitude studies or for Fs estimation in higher ground altitude areas under conditions of low radiometric noise, although its high sensitivity to noise should be taken into account. The investigations in this letter further indicate that the impact of ground altitude should be included in the uncertainty budgets of F-s retrievals and should be considered in the interpretation of F-s signals at the O-2-A absorption feature.
Year
DOI
Venue
2013
10.1109/LGRS.2013.2262106
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Keywords
DocType
Volume
Chlorophyll fluorescence,FluorMOD,Fraunhofer line discriminator (FLD),ground altitude,O-2-A band,photosynthesis
Journal
10
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
6
1545-598X
0
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.34
0
4
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Ruyin Cao132.18
Xuehong Chen24711.12
Jin Chen325931.87
Wei Yang421.72