Title | ||
---|---|---|
Medium-Earth-Orbit SAR Focusing Using Range Doppler Algorithm With Integrated Two-Step Azimuth Perturbation |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Existing low-Earth-orbit synthetic aperture radar (SAR) algorithms generally assume that the data are azimuth invariant. However, this assumption does not hold for the medium-Earth-orbit (MEO) SAR systems due to the significantly longer azimuth integration time and complex imaging geometries. As a result, the MEO SAR data cannot be processed accurately and efficiently using the existing algorithms. To solve this problem, this letter proposes a two-step azimuth perturbation (AP) method that uses the first-step AP to remove the bulk azimuth variance at the range processing stage and the second-step AP to remove the residual variance at the azimuth processing stage. As an example, an improved range Doppler algorithm with the integrated two-step AP is discussed in this letter. Simulations of an L-band MEO SAR with 5-m resolution at 10 000-km orbit height are used to demonstrate the validity and accuracy of this algorithm. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2353674 | IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
synthetic aperture radar,range doppler algorithm,perturbation theory,range doppler (rd) algorithm,l-band meo sar,earth orbit,synthetic aperture radar (sar) data processing,remote sensing by radar,medium-earth-orbit (meo),azimuth perturbation (ap),medium-earth-orbit sar focusing,integrated two-step azimuth perturbation,remote sensing,doppler effect,azimuth,geometry | Radar imaging,Synthetic aperture radar,Side looking airborne radar,Remote sensing,Medium Earth orbit,Azimuth,Algorithm,Inverse synthetic aperture radar,Time delay and integration,Doppler effect,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
12 | 3 | 1545-598X |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.41 | 8 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Lijia Huang | 1 | 31 | 6.40 |
Xiaolan Qiu | 2 | 190 | 26.75 |
Donghui Hu | 3 | 171 | 16.73 |
Bing Han | 4 | 27 | 9.29 |
Chibiao Ding | 5 | 223 | 33.52 |