Title | ||
---|---|---|
Using a Multistructural Object-Based LiDAR Approach to Estimate Vascular Plant Richness in Mediterranean Forests With Complex Structure |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A multistructural object-based LiDAR approach to predict plant richness in complex structure forests is presented. A normalized LiDAR point cloud was split into four height ranges: 1) high canopies (points above 16 m); 2) middle-high canopies (8-16 m); 3) middle-low canopies (2-8 m); and 4) low canopies (0-2 m). A digital canopy model (DCM) was obtained from the full normalized LiDAR point cloud, and four pseudo-DCMs (pDCMs) were obtained from the split point clouds. We applied a multiresolution segmentation algorithm to the DCM and the four pDCMs to obtain crown objects. A partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) algorithm was applied to predict total vascular plant richness using object-based image analysis (OBIA) variables, derived from the delineated crown objects, and topographic variables, derived from a digital terrain model. Results showed that the object-based model was able to predict the total richness with an r2 of 0.64 and a root-mean-square error of four species. Topographic variables showed to be more important than the OBIA variables to predict richness. Furthermore, high-medium canopies (8-16 m) showed the biggest correlation with the total plant richness within the structural segments of the forest. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2372875 | IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett. |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
laser radar,image segmentation,predictive models,digital terrain model,image resolution,lidar,remote sensing,bootstrapping,parameter estimation,biodiversity,root mean square error | Journal | 12 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 1545-598X | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.55 | 4 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Javier Lopatin | 1 | 6 | 1.26 |
Mauricio Galleguillos | 2 | 18 | 3.64 |
Fabian Ewald Fassnacht | 3 | 94 | 9.85 |
Andres Ceballos | 4 | 10 | 1.09 |
Jaime Hernández | 5 | 16 | 2.36 |