Title | ||
---|---|---|
Ergodic Capacity Comparison of Different Relay Precoding Schemes in Dual-Hop AF Systems With Co-Channel Interference |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we analyze the ergodic capacity of a dual-hop amplify-and-forward relaying system, where the relay is equipped with multiple antennas and subject to co-channel interference and the additive white Gaussian noise. Specifically, we consider three heuristic precoding schemes, where the relay first applies the: 1) maximal-ratio combining (MRC); 2) zero-forcing (ZF); and 3) minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) principle to combine the signal from the source, and then steers the transformed signal toward the destination with the maximum ratio transmission (MRT) technique. For the MRC/MRT and MMSE/MRT schemes, we present new tight analytical upper and lower bounds for the ergodic capacity, while for the ZF/MRT scheme, we derive a new exact analytical ergodic capacity expression. Moreover, we make a comparison among all three schemes, and our results reveal that, in terms of the ergodic capacity performance, the MMSE/MRT scheme always has the best performance and the ZF/MRT scheme is slightly inferior, while the MRC/MRT scheme is always the worst one. Finally, the asymptotic behavior of ergodic capacity for the three proposed schemes are characterized in large N scenario, where N is the number of relay antennas. Our results reveal that, in the large N regime, both the ZF/MRT and MMSE/MRT schemes have perfect interference cancellation capability, which is not possible with the MRC/MRT scheme. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/TCOMM.2014.2329492 | Communications, IEEE Transactions |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Amplify-and-forward systems,Spread spectrum communication,Encoding | Journal | 62 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
7 | 0090-6778 | 32 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
1.02 | 31 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Guangxu Zhu | 1 | 343 | 24.03 |
Caijun Zhong | 2 | 2007 | 120.77 |
Himal A. Suraweera | 3 | 2639 | 117.31 |
Z. Zhang | 4 | 2308 | 198.54 |
Chau Yuen | 5 | 4493 | 263.28 |
Rui Yin | 6 | 129 | 11.38 |